Eckmann-Hilton Argument
The Eckmann-Hilton Argument states that for any
two Binary
Operations
with units
such that
is a homomorphism with respect to
, then
- is Commutative
- is Associative
The proof is an exercise in some easy algebra:
First, note that
the statement that is homomorphism means that it must be a
homomorphism from the Product Magma
to
, and thus
-
If we unfold this, we get the following interchange law
-
Arumed with this observation, let us show that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Next,
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On to commutativity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, associativity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corollaries